A school that has been providing meals to its pupils may find, without warning, that the programme has been scaled back, that the
supply has not arrived, or that the funds have been redirected. When this happens, the children who relied on the meals are the
ones who bear the cost. Some stop attending. Others attend hungry and cannot concentrate. The meal that the school had been
providing becomes, in effect, a promise that has been broken. Our work on school feeding is therefore as much about advocacy as it
is about delivery.
We work with county and national authorities to keep school feeding on the agenda. Feeding is often treated as a supplementary
programme, one that can be trimmed when budgets are tight. We make the case that it is not supplementary. A child who has not
eaten cannot learn. A child who does not know whether she will eat at school tomorrow cannot be expected to attend reliably.
Feeding is a precondition for the education that the school system exists to provide, and it should be funded and managed
accordingly.
The purpose of our work on school feeding is not to run feeding programmes ourselves. It is to make sure that the programmes that
schools depend on are funded, supplied, and managed in ways that allow them to keep going. A child who receives a meal at school
every day is a child who is more likely to attend, more likely to concentrate, and more likely to stay in school through the years
when dropouts are most likely. The meal is not the education. It is what makes the education possible. Our advocacy on school
feeding is part of making sure that children get both.